tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post6615032460780237841..comments2024-02-19T11:10:16.893-08:00Comments on Brown Moses Blog: Comments On The Use Of Chemical Weapons In SyriaBrown Moseshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17562126209980810351noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-59280829897580888282013-10-21T00:07:07.084-07:002013-10-21T00:07:07.084-07:00I really like the content of this blog. it is one ...I really like the content of this blog. it is one of the most outstanding blog i have ever seen in my life. i just love it.<br /><a href="http://www.expressbedz.co.uk" rel="nofollow"> Leather beds in London </a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06215786991184520008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-30647239045235888952013-10-11T05:59:12.300-07:002013-10-11T05:59:12.300-07:00I should start this post by saying that in the pas...I should start this post by saying that in the past I've found much of what's been posted on Global Research to be far to conspiratorial for my liking, and in many cases just plain nonsense (for example this piece), so when I say this piece is a good round up of reports of chemical weapon use in Syria, it's not something I say lightly.<br /><br /><b><a href="http://www.allamericanpeptides.com/" rel="nofollow">Buy peptides</a></b> gexhouse2https://www.blogger.com/profile/05977714985765400749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-8929391850871804772013-05-23T04:08:19.213-07:002013-05-23T04:08:19.213-07:00Whatever you wrote that is real fact. Each and eve...Whatever you wrote that is real fact. Each and every thing having 2 sides but now a days everyone using good things for bad purpose. I like your post.<br /><br />But I use some <a href="http://www.100salts.com/CategoryProducts.aspx?GroupId=1&CategoryName=Water%20Treatment%20&%20Detergents" rel="nofollow">Water Treatment & Detergents chemicals </a>for my personal purpose. preetihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12924767892045238007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-58745878986260862092013-05-23T03:59:53.418-07:002013-05-23T03:59:53.418-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.preetihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12924767892045238007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-57974683849972031852013-05-10T04:19:12.352-07:002013-05-10T04:19:12.352-07:00I'm going to put together a questionnaire and ...I'm going to put together a questionnaire and send it to some experts I know, get them on record about these things.Brown Moseshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17562126209980810351noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-91316387806020443732013-05-10T04:17:09.294-07:002013-05-10T04:17:09.294-07:00I remember a counter-point now to your rocket vs. ...I remember a counter-point now to your rocket vs. truck bomb comparison re: death tolls. <br /><br />One of the problems with the chemical aspect in those Iraq blasts was the heat of the explosion cooked off most of the chlorine before it could hurt anyone (read that around). Thus, only an unlucky few (further from the blast?) died, and mainly it's just the truck bomb itself doing anything. <br /><br />So if there was hardly any blast, just a poof of chlorin/saline/HcL gas, it might be much more deadly. And then, no one has seen the impact zone yet - how indoors vs. outdoors, what kind of breeze, etc. Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4871088750473093560.post-38982909830380968712013-05-09T06:27:52.287-07:002013-05-09T06:27:52.287-07:00Oh, hey... thanks. (this is me, AL/CL). You raise ...Oh, hey... thanks. (this is me, AL/CL). You raise valid-seeming questions about the death toll in Khan al-Assal, and other points. I really don't know how many pounds of what would be needed, or anything like that. And as I said elsewhere, interesting points about the weapons (which got more interesting just now). <br /><br />I do note there's no response to the main content on the investigation. That also seems pretty fair. <br /><br />Also, let me apologize to you and anyone who reads that article that I didn't get the (20%) shortened edit with typos fixed and the April 4 agreement worked in, turned in soon enough, so we're stuck with this version. Not too bad, but could've been better. Caustic Logichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03082923821952309709noreply@blogger.com